It is not only highly efficient but also photorealistic and suits projects of any scale.

The best one we’ve used and still using is Vray. With more than 12 years in the market as an architectural rendering studio, Imagist3ds have some thoughts to share on the subject: Though there are dozens of rendering software out there, Twinmotion, Enscape, Lumion, Vray, etc. The ease of use lumion/twinmotion stuf can come later.So, you just finished your 3D modeling for an architecture design, and need to choose a rendering software and take the project to the next step like most interior designers and architects who would start trying to make their own 3D renders. In my opinion D5 should focus on quality now and extra functions. The points of improvement flamingo mentions would be a huge addition as lots of elements which are mentioned on the road map. I think the software has the tech to be that ambitious. So let’s beat the hell out of the competitors and make D5 close to corona / vray and above the other ease of use competitors. The difference between lumion and VRAY is huge.

There is a difference between UE and VRAY for example BUT that difference is very small in my opinion. They dont improve that much anymore.ĭ5 will never be 100% like vray or corona. For example in my opinion lumion is stuck quality wise. That would be the way to knock out the competitors. If they focus on ease of use but also have the ambition to strive towards photorealism and be competive with vray / corona,… quality wise. So if that would be the sole target of D5 the competition would be to hard. But there are lots of competitors on the market which can produce ‘acceptable’ images with a state of the art ease of use. I also think we should strive for perfection.

V ray vs enscape